"Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 5,198,585 tested so far". What?!
While https://panopticlick.eff.org/ is not really new, I learned about that site only recently. And while I knew that browser self-identification would reduce my anonymity on the Internet, I didn't expect this result:
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 5,198,585 tested so far.
Wow. Why? Let's try one of the others browsers I use. "Appears to be unique", again (where Flash is enabled). What's so unique about my setup? The two reports say about my setup:
Characteristic | One in x browsers have this value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Browser | Firefox 36.0.1 |
Google Chrome 42.0.2311.68 |
Chromium 41.0.2272.76 |
User Agent | 2,030.70 | 472,599.36 | 16,576.56 |
HTTP_ACCEPT Headers | 12.66 | 5477.97 | 5,477.97 |
Browser Plugin Details | 577,620.56 | 259,929.65 | 7,351.75 |
Time Zone | 6.51 | 6.51 | 6.51 |
Screen Size and Color Depth | 13.72 | 13.72 | 13.72 |
System Fonts | 5,198,585.00 | 5,198,585.00 | 5.10 (Flash and Java disabled) |
Are Cookies Enabled? | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 |
Limited supercookie test | 1.83 | 1.83 | 1.83 |
User agent and browser plug-ins hurt, fonts alone kill me altogether. Ouch. Update:
- It's the very same when browsing with an incognito window. Re-reading, what that feature is officially intended to do (being incognito to your own history), that stops being a surprise.
- Chromium (with Flash/Java disabled) added
Thoughts on fixing this issue:
I'm not sure about how I want to fix this myself. Faking popular values (in a popular combination to not fire back) could work using a local proxy, a browser patch, a browser plug-in maybe. Obtaining true popular value combinations is another question. Fake values can reduce the quality of the content I am presented, e.g. I would not fake my screen resolution or be sure to not deviate by much, probably.